SCOTT talk:SCOTT-NO November 2017

From Use Cases to Show Cases

• Starting point: use case scenario(s)
• from use cases
• to development
• to implementation
• to demonstration
• to showcases

Each use case should have three categories for BuildingBlocks (BB)

1. Need to have (for the functioning of the use case)
2. Nice to have (could contribute to the use case, depends on developments and API)
3. Future "enhancing the story"

Example:

• need to be established

https://www.helpnetsecurity.com/2017/01/05/iot-trust-framework/ 37 principles for IoT trust framework

Challenges

Reviewer(s) and Forms:

• Why do we need "harmonised deliverables"?
• Focus on impact of use case

Real-world relevance

• from use cases to development to implementation to demonstration to showcases

Administrative overhead

• bin-counting dominated: deliverables, excel, phone conferenes, coordination
• too little focus on technical work

Impact on National and European Scale

• Driving forces are often the BuildingBlocks, not the use cases
• missing focus on showcases for SCOTT
• impact analysis for Europe:
  • Leadership (ECSEL)
  • Jobb creation

WP showcases and updates

WP6 - coordinating

WP7 - Air Quality -

• showcase: Smart Remmen and VTT
• extended by management
• Workshop as main showcase

WP8 - Managed Wireless

• 25 installations Smart Home
• Showcase: wireless services
• Future Showcase: 5G Network slicing for Free Access to Health, Education and Governmental Information

WP9

• 20 scenarios, define "new scenario" using 3 building blocks: ABAC, ...
• showcase: facility management in Gdansk (replay from DEWI)

WP13 - Trustable Wireless vehicle communication network

• 4 PM EyeNetworks - smart sensors
• 2 PM moved to WP26, due to required manpwoer for meas. sec development

WP14

• 1 PM move to WP26

WP15 - Vehicle as sensor (related to WP9)

• UiO 3 PM - 1 PM used, 1 PM used
• SmartIO 3 PM -> moved to WP8
• Telenor, Wolffia, HiOA

WP21 - Assisted living and community care

• showcase: fall sensor
• showcase: diabetes monitoring
• future showcase: 4.75G Network Slicing (interoperability: health care and alarm services co-ordinating)

BUZ cooperation

• F-Sense as SDK to EyeNetworks, TellU and Telenor

Future: Assessment of Technology

SP1 suggestion: assessment of each requirement

• assessment of implementation of requirements
• based on state of implementation
• Draft proposal D1.1.
• Proposal: Adding more granularity
• "readiness level"

Suggestion: High-level view

• focus on building blocks
• SP1: Requirements (driving the project?)
• SP2: The story of future services and their requirements (use cases)
• SP3: Technology development