Browse wiki

From its-wiki.no

Jump to: navigation, search
API comparison: Protege, OWL and SPARQL
Course UNIK4710  + , UNIK9710  +
Keywords OWL API  + , Protege API  + , Semantic MediaWiki  + , Instances  +
Learning outcomes Having joined this lecture, you * will haHaving joined this lecture, you * will have gained an understanding on the main differences between the OWL and the Protege API * you will be able to address the advantages/shortcomings of the APIs * will have established your own program using one of these APIs * are able to define the outcome of your project using these APIse outcome of your project using these APIs  +
Lecturer Josef Noll  +
Objective During this lecture we will continue the discussion of the differences between Protege, OWL, SPARQL (and Jena) APIs. The expected outcome is a comparison between the APIs.  +
References References: * API comparison * Protege APIReferences: * API comparison * Protege API Guide: http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/ProtegeOWL_API_Programmers_Guide * OWL API Documentation: http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/documentation.html * SPARQL API: More info: * Protege 4 Migration: http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/Protege4Migration * Ontology comparison (SMW-OWL) - http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Ontology_import * Semantic MediaWiki: [[Media:SemanticMW.pdf]] * Subclass or Instance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology_components/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology_components  +
Time 0900-1200  +
Title API comparison: Protege, OWL, SPARQL, Jena  +
Creation dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 26 April 2013 10:16:44  +
Categories UNIK4710  + , UNIK9710  + , Lecture  +
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 23 May 2014 17:10:30  +
DateThis property is a special property in this wiki. 25 April 2014  +
hide properties that link here 
API comparison: Protege versus OWL redirect page
 

 

Enter the name of the page to start browsing from.