TEK5110/Group work

From its-wiki.no
Revision as of 22:14, 13 August 2022 by Josef.Noll (Talk | contribs)

(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

back to TEK5110

Suggestions for Group Work

1. How can we bring access to the Internet to every part of the world? (antenna, range, frequency,
2. How can we ensure that everyone has free access to the information? (Internet Lite, Raspberry Lite)
3. What is the right network for the application I'm looking for
- sensors
- home broadband
- rural areas
4. How can we control and troubleshoot communication networks? (what do we need to know?, autoconfig LNCC, scripts )
5. How can we monitor and control electricity systems (households: Schneider)

Goal of group work

The main goal for your project work is to analyse an application scenario with respect to a complete system design. Thus,

1. establish the application goals with respect to coverage, capacity, or maintainability
2. have a system in mind that delivers the expected applications
3. Select your evaluation criteria, e.g. price, performance, capacity for the system evaluation
4. Divide the system into components, and perform an analysis of the components. Establish the required models for an appropriate calculation of the system performance.
5. Present the results, using the evaluation criteria defined earlier
6. Compare the outcome of the system analysis with your application goals
7. evaluate your results, e.g. by identifying components/functionalities which influence your system
8. suggest further work, and provide reasons for those suggestions

Material

Media:RPI_Wordpress_installation.pdf

Evaluation criteria for Group Work

The results of your work should be presented during the last lecture, and a short report (max 12 pages) has to be established. The report can be separate, or can just be a description of what is on you slides.

Your presentation is expected to last for 25-35 min. Your presentation will be evaluated with respect to the following criteria:

Application scenario/Use case

  • Is the use case compellingly described (clear objectives/what to achieve)

Identification of functionalities of the system components

  • Which are the functionalities that have to be modelled?
  • Are the models suitable for the analysis?

Perform the analysis

  • What are the results of my calculations/measurements/monitoring?
  • To what extends satisfy the models the expected functionality?
  • What is the sensitivity of my results?

Critical review and future work

  • are the critics well reasoned?
  • do what degree is the future work addressing shortcomings?