Difference between revisions of "IoTSec:Privacy Label explanation"
From its-wiki.no
Josef.Noll (Talk | contribs) |
Josef.Noll (Talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Four areas | + | <span style="color:#009000">Four areas |
| − | # which data are collected | + | # <span style="color:#009000">which data are collected |
| − | # sharing to my phone, my cloud, public cloud,... | + | # <span style="color:#009000">sharing to my phone, my cloud, public cloud,... |
| − | # data communication integrity and storage | + | # <span style="color:#009000">data communication integrity and storage |
| − | # further distribution of data, ownership of data, further processing | + | # <span style="color:#009000">further distribution of data, ownership of data, further processing |
<span style="color:#009000">Open issues | <span style="color:#009000">Open issues | ||
Revision as of 14:45, 20 November 2017
| Security in IoT for Smart Grids | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Four areas
- which data are collected
- sharing to my phone, my cloud, public cloud,...
- data communication integrity and storage
- further distribution of data, ownership of data, further processing
Open issues
- access control (authentication) - transparency of authentication level
- maintenance and update
A++
- no data are shared
A+
A - Very high
- restricted use of data to purpose only (particular service)
- supplier should bear the risk of incidents, e.g. they rather than I get penalised when things go wrong - equivalent to finansavtaleloven
- if device is stolen - nobody else
B
- specify the data to be collected, re-use for statistical data only, ensured integrity
- customizable access control, eg.. add stronger authentication or consent requirements
- must be able to trade off the various security requirements, e.g. confidentiality agains availability - i.e. I want flexibility
- compliance with other standards - and this be listed (information requirement) - clipper compatible
- anonymity of my interaction with the supplier
- customer can control with how the information is transferred and used by a third party
C
- data are collected without control (GPS+activity+heart rate), re-use only for statistical, encrypted storage
- must be possible to withdraw consent - and that this results in all relevant information being deleted - and proof of deletion
D
- data are collected, transparency of re-use
- Data is not sold without consent/knowledge
- transparency - I get told about the criteria that the supplier has used in their information classification
- Information is only used for its legitimate purpose
E
- collected data, no transparency of re-use
- in compliance with GDPR
- if data is stolen, I will get told
- notification if DSO is hacked
F - Failure
- no privacy, no control of data, everyone can see
- nothing , no expectations
Group 2:
- 3 grades: strong, medium, weak
Group 3:
- consent,
- level of control,
- notion of data sensitivity
- transparency
Influence parameters
- data
- control functionality
- security techniques
- accountability
- access to data