Difference between revisions of "UNIK4750/List of papers - 2019"
(Created page with "== Evaluation criteria == Your presentation is expected to last for 15 minutes, you will be stopped at 16:00. That means you need to identify the key messages of the selected...") |
(→Evaluation criteria) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Evaluation criteria == | == Evaluation criteria == | ||
− | Your presentation is expected to last for | + | Your presentation is expected to last for 25 minutes, you will be stopped at 26:00. That means you need to identify the key messages of the selected paper. There is penalty for both being too short and for being too long. You will get questions about your paper and your presentation. One block of presentation and questions will approximately take 30 min. |
Your presentation will be evaluated with respect to the following criteria: | Your presentation will be evaluated with respect to the following criteria: | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* ''clear structure, clear and concise slides'' | * ''clear structure, clear and concise slides'' | ||
* ''Provide examples, and respect the time'' | * ''Provide examples, and respect the time'' | ||
+ | |||
+ | The quality of your presentation will weigh 20% of your final grade. | ||
= List of papers for UNIK 4750 = | = List of papers for UNIK 4750 = |
Revision as of 22:03, 3 February 2019
Wiki for ITS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Evaluation criteria
Your presentation is expected to last for 25 minutes, you will be stopped at 26:00. That means you need to identify the key messages of the selected paper. There is penalty for both being too short and for being too long. You will get questions about your paper and your presentation. One block of presentation and questions will approximately take 30 min.
Your presentation will be evaluated with respect to the following criteria:
Knowledge and Overview over topics in the paper
- what is the paper about, which specific aspects are addressed?
Identification of key findings of the paper:
- why are the findings key findings, to what extend are they different from the state-of-knowledge?
- what are the strengths/weaknesses of the approaches being mentioned
Scientifically precise presentation
- Be precise in your formulations, avoid story telling.
- Use numbers where appropriate, e.g. 20% more instead of much more
Evaluation of the paper
- what is your take on the paper? Criticism, own thoughts,...
Style:
- clear structure, clear and concise slides
- Provide examples, and respect the time
The quality of your presentation will weigh 20% of your final grade.
List of papers for UNIK 4750
Attached is a list of papers, from whom you may select one to be presented later in the course. Alternatively, select an academic paper of your choice. We suggest to start with Google Scholar or Microsoft Academics. Read more on: Guide on how to search for Literature
- 12) Langer, Lucie et al., "From old to new: Assessing cybersecurity risks for an evolving smart grid"
Andreas :15) Mohsen Nia, A., Jha, N.K., "A Comprehensive Study of Security of Internet-of-Things"
Sondre :17) Weber, Rolf H., Studer, Evelyne, "Cybersecurity in the Internet of Things: Legal aspects"
- 20) Anna Kornfeld Simpson et al., "Securing Vulnerable Home IoT Devices With an In-hub Security Manager
Simen :23) Goran Pulkkis et al., "Secure and Reliable Internet of Things Systems for Healthcare"
Christoffer, :24) Manuel Barbosa et al., "SAFETHINGS: Data Security by Design in the IoT"
Rambi :27) P. Vagdevi et al., "Home: IOT based home automation using NFC"
- 29) Thales L. von Sperling et al., "Tracking intruders in IoT networks by means of DNS traffic analysis"
Salman :34) Ali Dorri et al., "Blockchain for IoT security and privacy: The case study of a smart home"
Junaid :37) D. Mourtzis et al., "Industrial Big Data as a Result of IoT Adoption on Manufacturing"