Course
|
UNIK4710 +
, UNIK9710 +
|
Keywords
|
OWL API +
, Protege API +
, Semantic MediaWiki +
, Instances +
|
Learning outcomes
|
Having joined this lecture, you
* will ha … Having joined this lecture, you
* will have gained an understanding on the main differences between the OWL and the Protege API
* you will be able to address the advantages/shortcomings of the APIs
* will have established your own program using one of these APIs
* are able to define the outcome of your project using these APIse outcome of your project using these APIs +
|
Lecturer
|
Josef Noll +
|
Objective
|
During this lecture we will continue the discussion of the differences between Protege, OWL, SPARQL (and Jena) APIs.
The expected outcome is a comparison between the APIs. +
|
References
|
References:
* API comparison
* Protege API … References:
* API comparison
* Protege API Guide: http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/ProtegeOWL_API_Programmers_Guide
* OWL API Documentation: http://owlapi.sourceforge.net/documentation.html
* SPARQL API:
More info:
* Protege 4 Migration: http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/Protege4Migration
* Ontology comparison (SMW-OWL) - http://www.semantic-mediawiki.org/wiki/Help:Ontology_import
* Semantic MediaWiki: [[Media:SemanticMW.pdf]]
* Subclass or Instance: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology_components/en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ontology_components +
|
Time
|
0900-1200 +
|
Title
|
API comparison: Protege, OWL, SPARQL, Jena +
|
Creation dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
26 April 2013 10:16:44 +
|
Categories |
UNIK4710 +
, UNIK9710 +
, Lecture +
|
Modification dateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
23 May 2014 17:10:30 +
|
DateThis property is a special property in this wiki.
|
25 April 2014 +
|