Difference between revisions of "Monitoring the home energy distribution - Feature extraction through AI (4/7)"
Josef.Noll (Talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{Thesis |Titel=Monitoring the home energy distribution - Feature extraction through AI (thesis #4/7) |User=N.n. |Supervisor=Josef.Noll, György Kálmán, |DueDate=2022/05/12...") |
(No difference)
|
Latest revision as of 14:48, 1 June 2021
Wiki for ITS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Monitoring the home energy distribution - Feature extraction through AI (thesis #4/7)
by | N.n. |
---|---|
Supervisor(s) | Josef.Noll, György Kálmán |
Due date | 2022/05/12 |
Status | Planned |
Problem description: | Future Homes have the opportunity to be adaptive to the quality of the electricity grid. By monitoring the energy consumption on fuse-level every 10 seconds, one can generate energy profiles of private homes. Current regulations suggest a reading of power values 1/hour, or in maximum every 15 min. Given a high-frequency reading of power consumption (1/10s, 1/min) might give an opportunity to introduce new services.
Given the size of the work, several theses can be performed on the topic:
The assessment will be based on high-frequency consumption data from actual smart meters and power taggs by fuse level, as well as modelling of services. |
Methods and Tools: | The tools and methods in this thesis are based on
|
Time schedule | The envisaged time schedule (for a long thesis/60 ECTS) is:
|
Pre-Knowledge | This thesis includes a reasonable amount of programming. The envisaged thesis involved security and semantics. |
Approved | Pending by |
Keywords | IoTSec, Fog computing, Edge computing, Privacy, Services, Smart Home |
Depiction |
this page was created by Special:FormEdit/Thesis, and can be edited by Special:FormEdit/Thesis/Monitoring the home energy distribution - Feature extraction through AI (4/7)
This page provides hints on what to include in your master thesis.
TOC
Title page, abstract, ...
- 1. Introduction, containing: short intro into the area, what is happening
- 1.1 Motivation, containing: what triggered me to write about what I'm writing about
- 1.2 Methods, containing: which methods are you using, how do you apply them
- 2. Scenario, optional chapter for explaining some use cases
- 2.1 user scenario, (bad name, needs something bedre)
- 2.2 Requirements/Technological challenges
- 3. State-of-the art/Analysis of technology, structure your content after hardware/SW (or other domains). Describe which technologies might be used to answer the challenges, and how they can answer the challenges
- 3.1 technology A
- 3.2 technology B
- 4. Implementation
- 4.1 Architecture, functionality
- 4.2
- 5. Evaluation
- 6. Conclusions
- References
Comments
Red line
Your thesis should have a "red line", which is visible throughout the whole thesis. This means you should mention in the beginning of each chapter how the chapter contributes to the "goals of the thesis".
Use of scientific methods
A thesis follows a standard method:
- describe the problem (problemstilling)
- extract the challenges. These challenges should be measurable, e.g. method is too slow to be useful to voice handover.
- Analyse technology with respect to challenges. Don't write & repeat "everything" from a certain technology, concentrate on those parts (e.g. protocols) which are of importance for your problem
References
- Wikipedia is good to use to get an overview on what is happening. But there is not scientific verification of Wikipedia, thus you should use wikipedia only in the introduction of a chapter (if you use text from wikipedia). Use scientific literature for your thesis.
- Scientific library is "at your hand", you can get there directly from UiO: [[How to get access to IEEE, Springer and other scientific literature -> Unik/UiOLibrary]]
- I suggest that references to web pages, e.g. OASIS, W3C standards, are given in a footnote. Only if you find white papers or other .pdf documents on a web page then you refer to them in the reference section.
Evaluation of own work
Perform an evaluation of your own work. Revisit the challenges and discuss in how you fulfilled them. Provide alternative solution and discuss what should be done (or what could have been done).