Difference between revisions of "Innovation for All Based on Free Information Access"

From its-wiki.no
Jump to: navigation, search
(TOC)
 
(13 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Thesis
 
{{Thesis
 
|Titel=Innovation for All based through free Information Access
 
|Titel=Innovation for All based through free Information Access
|User=Wisam Ahmed,
+
|User=Wisam Ahmed Mansour,
 
|Supervisor=Nicolai Solberg Løvdal, Josef Noll,
 
|Supervisor=Nicolai Solberg Løvdal, Josef Noll,
|DueDate=2018/11/01
+
|DueDate=2018/06/13
|ThesisStatus=Ongoing
+
|ThesisStatus=Finished
 
|Objective=This thesis focusses on the societal challenges related to Digital Inclusion. Though mobile networks have the potential of reaching everyone, the reality is that roughly 3.5 Billion people are not connected to the Internet. Being left-out from the Digital Society removes the capabilities for reaching higher levels of the Maslow pyramid, e.g. meaningfull work.  
 
|Objective=This thesis focusses on the societal challenges related to Digital Inclusion. Though mobile networks have the potential of reaching everyone, the reality is that roughly 3.5 Billion people are not connected to the Internet. Being left-out from the Digital Society removes the capabilities for reaching higher levels of the Maslow pyramid, e.g. meaningfull work.  
  
Line 32: Line 32:
 
|Keywords=Basic Internet, Innovation4all, BasicInternet, SDGs, Agenda2030,
 
|Keywords=Basic Internet, Innovation4all, BasicInternet, SDGs, Agenda2030,
 
}}
 
}}
This page provides hints on what to include in your master thesis.
+
<span style="float: centre; font-size: 180%;" > The thesis is delivered, and can be downloaded following [[Media:EntrepNet_Thesis_Wisam_Mansour.pdf]] </span>
  
 
= Meeting =
 
= Meeting =
Line 38: Line 38:
 
* [[File:201801MeetingNotes_Wisam.pdf]] - meeting notes 10Jan2018
 
* [[File:201801MeetingNotes_Wisam.pdf]] - meeting notes 10Jan2018
 
* [[Media:201711MeetingNotes-Wisam-Entreprenuership.pdf]] - meeting notes 17Nov2017
 
* [[Media:201711MeetingNotes-Wisam-Entreprenuership.pdf]] - meeting notes 17Nov2017
* [[[[Media:https://drive.google.com/drive/my-drive]] - meeting record 1Dec2017
+
* [https://drive.google.com/drive/my-drive] - meeting record 1Dec2017
 
* next meeting Friday 14Dec 12:45 at Digital Insight, Fridtjof Nansen plass 9 (4th floor) - Rådhuset, 1060 Oslo
 
* next meeting Friday 14Dec 12:45 at Digital Insight, Fridtjof Nansen plass 9 (4th floor) - Rådhuset, 1060 Oslo
 
= TOC =
 
Abstract                                                                                                          iii
 
Acknowledgements                                                                                        v
 
Introduction
 
              1.1. Motivation and Background
 
                  1.1.1. Innovation bottom-up/ for all
 
                            ( Innovation from the bottom of Maslow pyramide)
 
                  1.1.2. BasicInternet & InfoInternet
 
                            ( Ongoing projects and the Agenda 2030)
 
            1.2. Contribution of the thesis
 
(The importance of this research )
 
            1.3. Thesis structure
 
                            (thesis protocols)
 
            1.4. Technique/ Methodology
 
                            (Scientific methods used)
 
Theoretical framework
 
              2.1. Local innovation and entrepreneurship
 
                            (Used types of entrepreneurship and ways of innovation)
 
              2.2. Entrepreneurs women role
 
              2.3. Disruptive field to enter
 
Problem statement (Scenario)
 
          3.1. Reality
 
                  (Local situation in the working areas in Tanzania, India, and Congo)
 
            3.2. Technological challenges
 
                  ( Digital / Internet use locally, awareness, and needs)
 
            3.3. Course of actions
 
                  ( Suggested solution )
 
Entrepreneurial platform (EntrepNet)
 
            4.1. Prototype / Mockup
 
                    4.1.1. Spots model
 
                          ( designed for people without access to private smart device)
 
                    4.1.2. Private model
 
                          ( designed for people with access to private smart device)
 
            4.2. Entrepreneurial stages
 
                            ( 3 stages: video courses, ideas, and teaming and funding)
 
            4.3. Incentives system
 
                            ( points per accomplished part, and point for referral of others)
 
            4.2. Questionnaire / Survey
 
Implementation
 
            5.1. Architecture 
 
                  ( creating suitable platform)
 
            5.2. Functionality
 
                    (Role of involved elements)
 
            5.3. Targeted segments
 
                    ( Users : No use, and limited use)
 
Analysis
 
            6.1. India
 
            6.2. Tanzania
 
EntrepNet assessment
 
            7.1.  pros and cons
 
(what should be keeped and what should be changed/removed)
 
            7.2. domestic requirements
 
(local required features)
 
Evaluation
 
              8.1. Limitation and improvement
 
              8.2 Future direction
 
                    (the solution/work done and whether that should have been done in another way)
 
Conclusion
 
            (The results, work done, further suggested actions)
 
References
 
 
Appendices           
 
                (Interviews transcript, interview guide, survey, platform architecture for PCs, tablets, and mobiles )
 
List of figures
 
 
List of tables
 
 
List of Abbreviations
 
 
= Comments =
 
== Red line ==
 
Your thesis should have a "red line", which is visible throughout the whole thesis. This means you should mention in the beginning of each chapter how the chapter contributes to the "goals of the thesis".
 
 
== Use of scientific methods ==
 
A thesis follows a standard method:
 
* describe the problem (''problemstilling'')
 
* extract the challenges. These challenges should be measurable, e.g. method is too slow to be useful to voice handover.
 
* Analyse technology with respect to challenges. Don't write & repeat "everything" from a certain technology, concentrate on those parts (e.g. protocols) which are of importance for your problem
 
 
References
 
* Wikipedia is good to use to get an overview on what is happening. But there is not scientific verification of Wikipedia, thus you should use wikipedia only in the introduction of a chapter (if you use text from wikipedia). Use scientific literature for your thesis.
 
* Scientific library is "at your hand", you can get there directly from UiO: [[How to get access to IEEE, Springer and other scientific literature -> Unik/UiOLibrary]]
 
* I suggest that references to web pages, e.g. OASIS, W3C standards, are given in a footnote. Only if you find white papers or other .pdf documents on a web page then you refer to them in the reference section.
 
 
== Evaluation of own work ==
 
Perform an evaluation of your own work. Revisit the challenges and discuss in how you fulfilled them. Provide alternative solution and discuss what should be done (or what could have been done).
 

Latest revision as of 10:46, 20 September 2018

Innovation for All based through free Information Access

by Wisam Ahmed Mansour
Supervisor(s) Nicolai Solberg Løvdal, Josef Noll
Due date 2018/06/13
Status Finished
Problem description: This thesis focusses on the societal challenges related to Digital Inclusion. Though mobile networks have the potential of reaching everyone, the reality is that roughly 3.5 Billion people are not connected to the Internet. Being left-out from the Digital Society removes the capabilities for reaching higher levels of the Maslow pyramid, e.g. meaningfull work.

The thesis will focus on innovation for all, based on the concept of free access to information. The hypothesis is that access to information, being text, pictures and local video, and the connectivity to a local village server will foster digital inclusion. Special attention is drawn to content fostering innovation for all, and the relation to the Sustainable Development Goals of the Agenda 2030

Methods and Tools: The tools and methods in this thesis are based on
  • A set of scenario, describing the challenges
  • A list of requirements being extracted from the scenarios
  • A description and evaluation of technologies and tools being candidates for solutions
  • A functional architecture/description of the envisaged system
  • An implementation of the core concepts
  • A demonstration of the solution
  • An evaluation of the solution, including a critical review of the descisions taken earlier
  • Conclusions
  • References
Time schedule The envisaged time schedule (for a long thesis/60 ECTS) is:
T0 0 starting month, T0+m denotes the month where the contribution to a certain chapter shalle be finalized
T0+2 months: create an initial page describing the scenario
T0+3: Provide a list of technologies which you think are necessary for the thesis
T0+4: Establish the table of content (TOC) of the envisaged thesis. Each section shall contain 3-10 keywords describing the content of that section
T0+7: Provide a draft of section 2 (scenario) and 3 (technologies)
T0+10: Establish a draft on what to implement/architecture
T0+11: Set-up an implementation, testing and evaluation plan
T0+15: Evaluate your solution based on a set of parameters, keep in mind there is no such thing as a free lunch
T0+17: Deliver the thesis
Pre-Knowledge This thesis includes an understanding of the principles of innovation, market aspects and socio-economic factors.
Approved Pending by
Keywords Basic Internet, Innovation4all, BasicInternet, SDGs, Agenda2030
Depiction

this page was created by Special:FormEdit/Thesis, and can be edited by Special:FormEdit/Thesis/Innovation for All Based on Free Information Access

The thesis is delivered, and can be downloaded following Media:EntrepNet_Thesis_Wisam_Mansour.pdf

Meeting