Pervasive computing in smart electricity grid
Wiki for ITS | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
A Survey on Novel Services in Smart Home, Optimized for Smart Electricity Grid
by | Kaniz Fatema Tuly |
---|---|
Supervisor(s) | Trond Aalberg, Christian Johansen, Josef Noll |
Due date | 2016/09/15 |
Status | Finished |
Problem description: | The final Thesis document .
Advancement in technology has not only transformed our life but also extended in every sphere of our way of living. Till now in most of the cases we are adapting our lifestyle with the way that is directed by the functions of the modern devices. But scientist are researching on more modern smart devices that should rather adapt with our lifestyle seamlessly. That is the core concept of pervasive computing - a collection of invisible and visible sensors and computing devices to ease our daily life. Smart Electricity Grid consists of a wide range of solutions for the electricity grids of the future. If we can utilize and integrate information communication technology with the contemporary electric grid system into smart grid that will make the production, storage, distribution and management of energy highly efficient which will eventually benefit our people, community, nation and country. Therefor the thesis will investigate the use of pervasive computing with smart electricity grid and identify the different aspects of relationship between them. |
Methods and Tools: | The tools and methods in this thesis are based on
|
Time schedule | The envisaged time schedule short thesis
|
Pre-Knowledge | This thesis addresses a security and privacy evaluation of services in the smart grid |
Approved | Approved by Christian Johansen |
Keywords | IoTSec, Smart grid |
Depiction |
this page was created by Special:FormEdit/Thesis, and can be edited by Special:FormEdit/Thesis/Pervasive computing in smart electricity grid
The final Thesis document .
This page provides hints on what to include in your master thesis.
TOC
Title page, abstract, ...
- 1. Introduction, containing: short intro into the area, what is happening
- 1.1 Motivation, containing: what triggered me to write about what I'm writing about
- 1.2 Methods, containing: which methods are you using, how do you apply them
- 2. Scenario, optional chapter for explaining some use cases
- 2.1 user scenario, (bad name, needs something bedre)
- 2.2 Requirements/Technological challenges
- 3. State-of-the art/Analysis of technology, structure your content after hardware/SW (or other domains). Describe which technologies might be used to answer the challenges, and how they can answer the challenges
- 3.1 technology A
- 3.2 technology B
- 4. Implementation
- 4.1 Architecture, functionality
- 4.2
- 5. Evaluation
- 6. Conclusions
- References
Comments
Red line
Your thesis should have a "red line", which is visible throughout the whole thesis. This means you should mention in the beginning of each chapter how the chapter contributes to the "goals of the thesis".
Use of scientific methods
A thesis follows a standard method:
- describe the problem (problemstilling)
- extract the challenges. These challenges should be measurable, e.g. method is too slow to be useful to voice handover.
- Analyse technology with respect to challenges. Don't write & repeat "everything" from a certain technology, concentrate on those parts (e.g. protocols) which are of importance for your problem
References
- Wikipedia is good to use to get an overview on what is happening. But there is not scientific verification of Wikipedia, thus you should use wikipedia only in the introduction of a chapter (if you use text from wikipedia). Use scientific literature for your thesis.
- Scientific library is "at your hand", you can get there directly from UiO: [[How to get access to IEEE, Springer and other scientific literature -> Unik/UiOLibrary]]
- I suggest that references to web pages, e.g. OASIS, W3C standards, are given in a footnote. Only if you find white papers or other .pdf documents on a web page then you refer to them in the reference section.
Evaluation of own work
Perform an evaluation of your own work. Revisit the challenges and discuss in how you fulfilled them. Provide alternative solution and discuss what should be done (or what could have been done).